Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chennai Swaggers (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). North America1000 20:52, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chennai Swaggers[edit]

Chennai Swaggers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SPORTSEVENT in the clause "game that is widely considered by independent reliable sources to be notable, outside routine coverage of each game". All references seem to be from PR publications due to involvement of actors. Also has been created by an WP:SPA; mostly for publicity purposes. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:29, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:31, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:31, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:39, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:00, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:25, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:33, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.