Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles osgood m.d.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to India Cholagogue. Tone 19:40, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Charles osgood m.d.[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to fail WP:BIO. I am not sure if WP:NPROF applies, but if it does, it seems to fail that one too. MrClog (talk) 17:24, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MrClog (talk) 17:24, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. MrClog (talk) 17:24, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment-I think this article actually has been made under this name before or a similar one that has been deleted, can't find it though. Anyway-either a delete or a draft is what I vote. I guess I'll go with delete. Wgolf (talk) 17:54, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep So we have someone who was published in a medical journal of its day, the fact that it's been preserved, archived, and digitized suggests it was itself of some historical importance and whose papers are held by an archives again suggesting historical notability. These sources, already present in the article suggest notability without my having to search for other sources. At minimum this should be a redirect to India Cholagogue, which was already at AfD (under the name India cholagogue) and speedy kept. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 15:11, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - The two articles appear to cover exactly the same ground, and so it makes little sense to have both. - Derek R Bullamore (talk) 15:28, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Thanks everyone for looking into this. I'm glad at least India cholagogue was kept. After reading everyone's thoughts, I'm thinking a Redirect to India Cholagogue isnt a bad way to go on this one, unless others chime in and vote keep Acronach (talk) 16:15, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG and the title is not capitalized. Also there are too many references for one single line. Syndicater (talk) 22:07, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment India Cholagogue's AfD was brought up earlier in this page, GNG was a question there as well, and that one passed. As I see it, if that passed GNG, this one should as well. Acronach (talk) 17:55, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to India cholagogue - Wikipedia:One sentence does not an article make - Epinoia (talk) 16:08, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.