Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Crumb

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Crumb family which has been restored to this version per consensus. If material is to be merged, the history is there. Star Mississippi 03:10, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Crumb[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BLP. Notable primarily due to his familiel association with Robert Crumb. Schierbecker (talk) 14:07, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Crumb family per the proposal at Talk:Charles Crumb#Merge to new article Crumb family. Jfire (talk) 15:35, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Comics and animation, and Pennsylvania. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:24, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as suggested. Bearian (talk) 17:19, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge This could easily be solved by merging this bio into the Crumb Family page. Go4thProsper (talk) 14:24, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This page can not be Merged or Redirect to Crumb family as this page is a Redirect.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think the proposal is to create a new article. It's not a bad idea. Schierbecker (talk) 23:47, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Correct; see the discussion I linked above. And the person who closes the AfD does not need to be the person who turns Crumb family into an article -- they can add {{Afd-merge to}} to Charles Crumb and let the community implement the decision. Jfire (talk) 23:55, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I see. Well, there has to be an existing article to Merge/Redirect to when this discussion gets closed as far as I know. I might leave this discussion for another closer. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:26, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Liz, the AFD at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Crumb_family turned a valid listicle into a (bad) redirect. The previous version at [1] could be restored. ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 02:46, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is a new consensus to revert the action of the 2009 AFD that turned this article into a Redirect to go back to this edit.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:39, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Schierbecker, Jfire, Bearian, and Go4thProsper: Ok with restoration of previous version of proposed merge target as a start? ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 08:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Jfire (talk) 15:19, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fine with this. Schierbecker (talk) 15:48, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I agree with these edits and support this version. Go4thProsper (talk) 23:30, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreed. Bearian (talk) 16:47, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.