Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaosweld

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 17:33, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chaosweld[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article appears to be an attempt by the owner of the ChaosWeld website and the publisher of the article's main reference to publicize his research. Google Scholar does not find the referenced article (perhaps it was never published or published in a foreign language) so it is impossible to tell if it has ever been cited. It IS possible to tell that the other referenced article does NOT cite Suban's paper. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:24, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete per CSD G11 JeremyMcClean (Talk) 21:37, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete (CSD G11). Of the 3 references, 2 are self-published, and the third does not mention either Suban or "the theory of chaos control." -- Radagast 3 (talk) 21:37, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:45, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.