Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chamupa Unlimited

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 03:35, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chamupa Unlimited[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The grammar issues alone would suggest draftify or TNT, however the article subject is also not notable. An attempt to move to draft space by another editor was reverted but really I don't see notability from current sourcing and do not believe there is other sourcing to suggest notability under NMUSIC, NENT, or GNG. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:32, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Chamupa Unlimited. The editor has been moving the article to mainspace multiple times. I tried what I could to push it back to draft since there was the MFD going. If you want to have the discussion here that's fine, pinging Dan arndt, Robert McClenon, SmokeyJoe to discuss here. Also there is a duplicate at Chamupa Unlimited (Music Produer). Anyway:

Speedy delete and salt all locations Editor is clearly WP:NOTHERE to build a useful article about himself but a promotional one that in this state would fulfill WP:CSD G11 blatant advertising. Throughout the re-creating, he has done nothing to improve the notability, just resubs and pushes to mainspace. No new sources that show notability, just more pointing to his websites. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:48, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I was unaware of the MfD - I glanced at the draft only to see it looked the same and so ignored any sort of banners as typical AfC stuff. Given that the article does exist in mainspace I nominated it here. What that means, if anything, for the MfD I admit I don't know. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:50, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:51, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:51, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails notability criteria (WP:MUSICBIO, WP:GNG) and feels promotional. Salting may be premature. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:57, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete and salt all locations, this has been identified on multiple occasions as being self-promotional, referenced with user-generated and unreliable sources, direct conflict of interest, advertising etc. It has been moved back to draft to allow the creator/editor to improve the article and when it has been refused through the AfC process the editor has moved to the mainspace anyway. The main editor has repeatedly removed maintenance tags, the AfC outcomes, and MfD tags without making any changes apparently in an attempt to present the article has not having any identified issues. Clearly the article is not going to met notability standards and these multiple efforts by the editor to circumvent due process has been a complete waste of everybody's else's time. Dan arndt (talk) 03:05, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, and delete all copies. This is blatant self promotion. The author blanks attempts to talk to him on his talk page. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:33, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.