Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chalo Trust School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:09, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Chalo Trust School[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has been bare of content of any value for over a year (since its original creation), and no editor of it has made any attempt to denote why it is notable, nor provide and references or links, and a quick search does not reveal any such reasons for notability. WP:ORGDEPTH is not readily met here. Besieged (talk) 16:50, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: have found, and added as External Link, a profile of the school at website of the US-based Kucetekela Foundation, which refers to it as among "Lusaka’s best secondary schools". PamD 21:56, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Verified secondary schools are invariably considered to be notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 08:58, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES and Wikipedia:Notability (high schools). Verified secondary schools have been determined of worthy of having a stand-alone article. Northamerica1000^(talk) 04:35, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.