Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chad–Sudan relations

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. WP:IAR per WP:SNOW and possibly a dusting of WP:SKCRIT#3 (for clarity, I arrived here from this discussion, and it seems fair to save the nom's blushes on at least one front) . (non-admin closure) >SerialNumber54129...speculates 16:02, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Chad–Sudan relations[edit]

Chad–Sudan relations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No basis for an article. Like most X-Y relations articles, this is just a random slapdash collection with no focus. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 19:58, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. TPH, why haven't you been banned from AfD yet? As you'd know if you read it, this isn't "a random slapdash collection with no focus", this is an article on two countries which have been fighting a lengthy and extremely high-profile war for years, and the relationship between the two is unquestionably a notable topic by Wikipedia standards. ‑ Iridescent 20:02, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep.. Could be better sourced and developed, but relations between neighboring countries are typically significant, and this pair is not an exception.Icewhiz (talk) 20:51, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep They're bordering countries, of course they have significant relations (or hostilities). WP:SOFIXIT. Nate (chatter) 22:33, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep notable, sourced topic of encyclopedic value. Passes GNG via CNN and BBC articles. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 22:43, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 02:18, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 02:18, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Neighbouring countries Nick-D (talk) 10:02, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.