Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cat Puns

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete (G1: Patent nonense, meaningless or incomprehensible) by Jimfbleak (talk · contribs)

Cat Puns[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insupportable list of non-notable facts, created as original research and which could only be maintained through further original research. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 16:01, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Purrsonally, I think it's a clear case of WP:FORUM. §everal⇒|Times 16:07, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per WP:OR. Lugia2453 (talk) 17:22, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete CATastrophe. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 17:58, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nonsense, and for not including the obvious and very hackneyed "Chairman Meow". And am I the only one who doesn't get the cat connection in Squint Eastwood? Keresaspa (talk) 18:37, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
After I !vote to delete this, I Can Has Cheezburger? --Arxiloxos (talk) 19:37, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Although the article may be fun, it would provide nothing useful for Wikipedia and it is likely that any links would be unreliable blogs, nothing significant for news coverage. SwisterTwister talk 20:59, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Provides no benefit to WikiPedia, as an encyclopedia. Also a per the previous delete reasons.--Clarkcj12 (talk) 00:10, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.