Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casey Trees

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus due to lack of participation. Barkeep49 (talk) 02:10, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Casey Trees[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

obvious coi advocacy for a program with insufficient evidence of notability DGG ( talk ) 04:47, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:26, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:26, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:27, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I'd like to hear from DC-resident Wikipedians. Bearian (talk) 20:54, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 02:43, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It has enough coverage. Omniscientmoose42 (talk) 09:09, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Generally an inclusionist but I also look for at least one big time reliable media outlet that reports on a non-profit like this with some kind of significant coverage to build a case around. I see something by CNN but it doesn't appear to offer this organization significant coverage. I would like to hear from those living in the DC area. I'm just not seeing that splash article that I typically look for. Lots of local and secondary reporting. --Tsistunagiska (talk) 16:44, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 12:59, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.