Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carry Minati

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:34, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Carry Minati

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person doesn't seem to be notable: a YouTuber with 314,000 subscribers is not that special (there are over 5,000 YouTubers with over double that number). Furthermore, no reliable sources have been written about this person. The only sources available seem to be (news) blogs and social media pages. User:Supercarwaar/signature 16:51, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

He should not have a wikipedia page just on the basis of having a youtube channel with not even a million subscribers, and his videos are not worth watching too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.107.116.154 (talk) 19:16, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, User:Supercarwaar This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... this article is about the famous Indian Youtuber CarryMinati (Whereas other Indian youtubers have also the same subscribers who is working in big project, and I feel that he will be not compared to the other you-tubers who has been gaining popularity worldwide. As in India, Youtube is new platform for people and rapidly growing for few years ago) who has rose to the fame because of his work on Youtube. he is emerging star of Youtube and gained popularity in very short period of time. His work has been appreciated by the singers and the comedians of India. This article should not be deleted because his more than 300K fans are seeking about his channel information and personal information. Since he became famous Youtuber in India, every fan of his has kept interest about knowing him. This is the third time I am writing the article of him, I hope, developer would understand my reason and also understand the importance of this article and why it should not be deleted from Wikipedia. User:Bizzlamichhane007

Not all YouTubers are notable. Delete. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 01:52, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Joyous! | Talk 01:49, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Being a YouTuber isn't enough for notability for an article. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I'm been doing} 02:19, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:14, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - most of the references are just blogs; delete per nom; fails WP:GNG Spiderone 10:41, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Not a single independent coverage does exist for this individual. Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG. Anup [Talk] 02:04, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete:This person exists only in Youtube and that is not any fact for the staying of the article.Aru@baska^{❯❯❯ Vanguard} 09:06, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.