Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Captain Miller (soundtrack)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:58, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Captain Miller (soundtrack)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources are about the film see no reason to have separate article for soundtrack.Music is not a hit. Tame Rhino (talk) 13:53, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, sufficiently sourced. The claim that "Sources are about the film" is hogwash. You have not argued to support that it's "not a hit". Geschichte (talk) 18:14, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and India. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:48, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The article contains refs to reliable sources about the soundtrack that seem enough to justify a standalone page. I would not be shocked if that was redirected, though, size and navigability permitting. But the problem would be that the redirected material would run the risk of being challenged as giving undue weight to the music..... (Opposed to deletion)-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 19:07, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The page has been substantially improved since nomination.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 20:07, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
keep keep per Mushy Yank rationale--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 21:24, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Article is well sourced and was accepted during AfC. The nominator has only joined this year, and has made hardly 30 edits, most are AfDs. Kailash29792 (talk) 21:04, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.