Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 03:16, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Capes[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article on a commercial toy or game product has zero (0) sources. A search on JSTOR, newspapers.com, and Google News fails to find any reference to "Capes" within the context of a toy, game, or games. Fails GNG. Chetsford (talk) 10:09, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Chetsford (talk) 10:10, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep if more sources can be found, otherwise merge to List of role-playing games by name. BOZ (talk) 18:52, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment if kept, this should be moved to Capes (role-playing game) and the dab page CAPES should move to this name. I don't see enough coverage but haven't look in enough depth to confidently !vote. power~enwiki (π, ν) 00:35, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, and for the same reason move the edit history if the page is redirected. BOZ (talk) 01:40, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There are no independent third party reliable sources in the article. The publisher is red-linked so merging is not an option. There is no indication this is a notable game, therefore it fails the notibility inclusion criterion stated on List of role-playing games by name. Fails WP:GNG. Jbh ^Talk 16:48, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 17:42, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, AmericanAir88^(talk) 14:45, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I've found this interview with the creator and a trivial mention in a book The Role-Playing Society: Essays on the Cultural Influence of RPGs. Notability guidelines are not met. power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:00, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Very minor product. Completely fails GNG. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:54, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.