Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caja de Ingenieros

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Delete !vote addressed by discovery of new links and nominator's subsequent comment. Kurykh (talk) 00:38, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Caja de Ingenieros[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable company; Google search reveals few sources, so it is therefore non-notable. Quasar G ^{t - c} 18:18, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No sources except for the company's homepage.2602:30A:2ED1:2EE0:C75:A3A0:1702:11EA (talk) 19:59, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep. A notable bank with many Spanish language sources available, e.g. [1], [2], [3], [4]. Easily passes WP:NCORP. Pburka (talk) 20:16, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I nominated this for deletion, but I agree with Pburka and would withdraw the nomination if there was not a vote for delete. When I performed a Google search, the search engine gave me only the company website and their social media pages (Google must have been filtering results by language, but didn't recognise these websites as Spanish), which led me to believe there were no news sources and the company was non-non-notable. Quasar G ^{t - c} 21:54, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.