Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brands Hatch race results
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. LFaraone 04:22, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Brands Hatch race results[edit]
- Brands Hatch race results (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Violation of WP:NOT#INFO especially WP:NOT#STATS Delete Secret account 22:35, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – this is far from indiscriminate (events at a specific race track) and there are no stats. Oculi (talk) 23:29, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete, not because these are stats - they're not - but because I don't think sports results by venue is quite encyclopedic. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:37, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - this is a legitimate WP:SPINOUT of Brands Hatch; this is not "stats" but rather tables of winners at the track, which is, in fact, encyclopedic information. - The Bushranger One ping only 08:17, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:38, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:38, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:38, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep but as Brands Hatch race winners. Some of the red links need to be changed to a link to an article on the competition or at least the season, rather than on one race. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:31, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and rename as per Peterkingiron. I've not come across these articles before, but they are just a list of winners, so have some value. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 17:49, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.