Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brady R. Allred (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:41, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Brady R. Allred[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Having removed a large mass of spamming in the article (which is currently unsourced), I attempted to find sources for this article, only to find that very few exist, and that none of the sources I could see constitute significant coverage. As far as I could see, the subject fails to meet WP:BASIC; and I am unsure he would meet WP:NMUSICIAN either. Java Hurricane 16:38, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Music, and Utah. Java Hurricane 16:40, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't believe this passed the first AfD. Did we lose some valuable references along the way? I checked the article as it stood just after the "keep" closed [1]. Nope, worse than at present. And it still has no real references. Some have been removed since the Afd, but they weren't worth anything. Mostly primary source, or verification that X played Here. No secondary source to indicate the performance was notable in any way. _signed,Willondon (talk) 19:16, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Things like this would be useful in verifying a couple of the basic facts asserted in the article, But it's a bare mention, and a primary source. Even a sportsbio might blush a little! (Too soon? Too soon.) Just doing lazy google-grade research here, but I'm really not seeing much in the way of proper secondary coverage at all. In fact, our article for the European Grand Prix for Choral Singing itself, impressive and all as it sounds, is primary sources too... Whiff of 'jobbing pro' rather than obvious actual notability here. 109.255.211.6 (talk) 20:08, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Inadequate sourcing to meet notability for WP:Basic, promotional in nature. Misleading links. NiklausGerard (talk) 18:58, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.