Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brady R. Allred

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep --Steve _(Stephen)^talk 06:36, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brady R. Allred[edit]

Notability not clear, originally written as a thank-you and not an article, and no sources to boot. Sentence structure and style aren't too good either. JoeyETS 01:14, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I may be dense, but I'm not seeing the evidence for "originally written as a thank-you and not an article" in the article's history or talk page. Could you be more explicit? Deor 01:37, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Heck, I'm just going to say keep on this one. I've added a source to the article and cleaned it up somewhat, and I think he satisfies the notability requirements for a person in his profession—per the awards listed in the external source if nothing else. Deor 02:18, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 02:01, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep. Meets criteria of WP:BIO. Needs improvement, though. User got bad nom faith.--Edtropolis 18:06, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brady_R._Allred&oldid=132693426 is where the thank you article was, on further investigation it looks like there might be more notability to this article than I first though when I nominated it. The thank you seemed to be an isolated instance of vandalism. There was a lot of bio information, but it was removed because of copyright violation. Once this discussion closes, and at this point I'd the article will most likely, be kept, someone should nominate it on wikipedia cleanup. Sorry for the mediocre call on nomination. That's the beauty of wikipedia, mistakes are filtered out by discussion. JoeyETS 22:08, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.