Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Z Szilagyi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 09:35, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Z Szilagyi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Local lawyer running for local prosecutor office. All coverage is in local home-town newspapers. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:25, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:08, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:08, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:POLITICIAN and my own standards for attorneys. Bearian (talk) 17:44, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Actually, I think may perhaps not have been just a candidate, but may actually have won, though that is not clear. He appears to have some coverage over the years in over 100 articles in a number of papers, such as the News Dispatch (Michigan City, IN), Herald Argus (La Porte, IN), and Post-Tribune (IN) (see here and here and here as well).--Epeefleche (talk) 18:38, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 05:50, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Tip of the hat to Epeefleche for noting he may have won, but... He's just one of the winners in the primary election, [1], so he's currently just a candidate running for a very local office (prosecutor of LaPorte County, Indiana). Being such a local officeholder is not sufficient notability, let alone a mere candidate. TJRC (talk) 19:17, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.