Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bissell Development Team

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 • (talk) 20:35, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bissell Development Team[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not sourced and not notable. Buzzards-Watch Me Work (talk) 02:10, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep No refs does not equate to non-notable. Suggest the nominator withdraws this and reads WP:BEFORE. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 10:09, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable due to no significant coverage. A reference search shows many also-ran mentions but no notable achievements so not qualifying--Mevagiss (talk) 13:05, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I'm sorry, but my search found plenty of significant coverage: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], etc. Their victories this year are here. Also note that Bissell is the name this year. Looking under previous names for the same team yields more results; [6], [7], [8], etc. Easily passes WP:GNG. Michitaro (talk) 14:32, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as Lugnuts says, only one ref does not equate to non-notable. (if so, a million articles should be deleted) Sander.v.Ginkel (talk) 09:12, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cycling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.