Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bio-Nucleonics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^talk 00:28, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bio-Nucleonics[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. The best source I found was this passing mention that doesn't come close to meeting WP:CORPDEPTH. None of the current references are reliable third-party sources that discuss the company in any detail. Huon (talk) 00:38, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:01, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:01, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:01, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and I myself would've deleted, nothing actually convincing here at all. SwisterTwister talk 06:31, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:03, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete a mere 2 gnews hits says it all for lack of coverage. LibStar (talk) 03:00, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: If this company is legit, it seems big enough to me to be notable. However, I couldn't quite tell whether the information on the WP page is real or exaggerated, so I'm not going to vote. OtterAM (talk) 20:30, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.