Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Fowler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Scott Burley (talk) 21:33, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Fowler[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, with only trivial mentions of the subject. WP:NCURLING criteria is passed, however the subject is only "presumed notable". Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:34, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:55, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:55, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. He passes WP:NCURLING, so he does not have to pass WP:GNG. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:16, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. PATH SLOPU 06:09, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. PATH SLOPU 06:09, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes WP:NCURLING as pointed out above. Smartyllama (talk) 14:00, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I think the additional references added are sufficient enough to have the article stay, though barely. -- Earl Andrew - talk 17:35, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Per above arguments, if an individual meets a subcategory of the notability guideline (WP:NCURLING), they pass WP:GNG. While the article could be improved, the concerns are met. Rollidan (talk) 20:33, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Article could be improved, but meets notability criterium # 3 as per WP:NCURLING. Spyder212 (talk) 20:39, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep Definitely meets WP:Notability. Article could do with a tidy up though. - Funky Snack (Talk) 15:26, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Has represented his country at the top level. Clearly notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:15, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.