Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Roymans

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:08, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Barbara Roymans[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Since a PROD was removed without any reason given by an IP, we need to follow the AfD process. The biography covers a non-notable contestant in a non-notable pageant, Miss Exclusive. The article's single source is not a RS; see WP:WikiProject Beauty Pageants/Sources which indicates world360news.com, which dubiously titles itself "Chhattisgarh News" aka chhattisgarh.news, is probably SPS. ☆ Bri (talk) 18:34, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Women, Beauty pageants, and Belgium. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:20, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Plenty of coverage in Belgian sources, in the Dutch language, but I'm not qualified to judge which are RS. They seem to cover her win. Oaktree b (talk) 21:56, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Here's the link for Belgian sources: [1]. The headline news one looks promising, but it's a simple annoucement. Oaktree b (talk) 21:59, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lacks in-depth coverage to meet WP:NBASIC. Bri, it seems that Miss Exclusive might be an alternative name for Miss Earth Belgium, not that this makes a significant difference to the AFD discussion. MrsSnoozyTurtle 02:39, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:30, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete based on lack of extensive coverage for this person, beyond confirmation of the win, which is trivial. Oaktree b (talk) 20:08, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.