Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bangkhuntien F.C.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 19:21, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bangkhuntien F.C.[edit]

Bangkhuntien F.C. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No claim or evidence of notability, nor of meeting the standards of WP:FOOTYN. The claims it does make are contradictory, a professional club in an amateur league. Disputed PROD. Cabayi (talk) 09:13, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 09:13, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 09:14, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Do any of those 3 links actually mention Bangkhuntien? Cabayi (talk) 13:24, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The programming Aquaelfin is referring to are the first two references currently in the article. --Paul_012 (talk) 14:12, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I define new WP:FOOTYN. I think don't true for old definition of WP:FOOTYN. It is fixed national cups such as Thai FA Cup, Chinese FA Cup, Emperor's Cup and etc. to determine Notability of Football club. It doesn't true because a lot of clubs don't join any national level of the league structure in countries can play national cups. especially knock-out national cups. You must fixed national league structure in countries and don't fixed national cups. Aquaelfin (talk) 4:13, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:18, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:33, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:19, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:RS, WP:IS, WP:GNG and WP:FOOTYN. The 3 sources in the article [1], [2] and [3] and the sources above [4] [5], and [6] have not demonstrated the core requirements of contain claimed need to be verified by independent, reliable sources to claimed subject notability, as sources are not independent and reliable]]. Any sport specific notability guidelines (or any Wikipedia guidelines) is NOT defined by an individual but by discussions and consensus agreements. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:00, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete If they complete in an amateur league I highly doubt the club is professional. Fails WP:FOOTYN. Govvy (talk) 14:59, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Amateur teams of Amateur league, which there is team history, have team wiki articles. Amateur teams of Amateur league don't team history in public news. they haven't wiki articles. Aquaelfin (talk) 17:11, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Wikipedia notability requirements are not defined by if a page has a history section or not. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 17:31, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Wikipedia notability is wrong defination. It is fixed national cups more than team in national level of the league structure. knock-out national cups such as FA Cup is joined by non-Amateur and non-Professional teams. It's call Out of league teams such as Traill International School in 2018 Thai FA Cup. Do you think this team has wiki article more than Amateur team ? Aquaelfin (talk) 17:49, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.