Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baeksang Arts Awards for Best Supporting Actress (TV)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. The discussion was lightly attended so no prejudice to re-nomination, but it does seem that a merger discussion might be a fruitful alternative to deletion. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 17:37, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Baeksang Arts Awards for Best Supporting Actress (TV)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am also bundling the following related articles into this nomination:

I think these are unnecessary content forks. Perhaps they could be merged into a master list but I'm not seeing significant coverage to warrant an article on each sub-category. SITH (talk) 18:41, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:12, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:12, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:13, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:13, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:14, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:13, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. These are WP:SPLITS or WP:SPINOFFS, not "content forks", a term that implies a duplication (and typically a POV one) rather than a subtopic. If you are asking for merger of these to the parent article, that's not a deletion request and so should have been pursued through normal editing and discussion. postdlf (talk) 23:29, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep all as they are valid splits from a notable article and reincorporating them all into the parent article would make it of a size that would slow down access on slow internet especially on mobile and that is the main reason articles are split in the first place, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 14:14, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~ {talk} 02:07, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If they're kept then attribution needs to be added for compliance with Wikipedia licensing requirements, since Khgg19 seems to have created these with cut/paste rather than following WP:SPINOUT. Bakazaka (talk) 07:46, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~ {talk} 12:50, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge all to Baeksang Arts Awards. Articles too insubstantial and unsourced to merit individual articles themselves, also they don't demonstrate that they are notable. The main article is not substantial enough itself to warrant splitting. Redirect will also be OK for some of them as they appear to be insignificant. Hzh (talk) 15:39, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.