Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bad Gud Guy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 15:57, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Gud Guy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Piece of fluff created by someone who is trying to promote a student short film. No sources except IMDb and one self-source. Bbb23 (talk) 07:20, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No WP:RS provided, none found. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 09:57, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as no evidence of any notability. –Davey2010 • (talk) 11:59, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:47, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:48, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete for failing WP:NF. After this was nominated and rather performing the suggested tagging for issues, an anon IP blanked most of the article without providing an edit summary. And even though I do not believe this topic will show itself notable enough for inclusion, I looked to MOS:FILM and WP:ATD and returned the 'blanked' information and tagged it for sources. Might seem a waste of effort, but a bit better than blanking... and how else can a new contributor better understand our requirements than through example? Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 17:58, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not finding coverage in reliable sources to qualify an article per WP:N. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:02, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.