Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BTR–EMS–AKG Janakeeya Vedi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus but if the article isn't suitably improved, would recommend renominating this pretty soon. Daniel (talk) 11:00, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BTR–EMS–AKG Janakeeya Vedi[edit]

BTR–EMS–AKG Janakeeya Vedi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not satisfy either notability or verifiability. Recommend delete. Vikram Vincent 19:28, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 19:33, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 19:33, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 19:34, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, the movement was notable at a certain juncture in Kerala politics, represented a significant break within the party with several prominent leaders. Sourcing is difficult, since Malayalam-language media from 2003-2005 isn't readily available online. Here is some media coverage on the 2004 election campaign in English sources; [1], [2], [3], [4] see also [5]. --Soman (talk) 00:46, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: the links presented do make a mention of the org but not sure it means notability deserving a page. Perhaps a single page on factions with the various factions which have minimal coverage could be done. I also don't know if we will get more discussion on this topic considering the current status of only creator and nominee participating. Vikram Vincent 06:24, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: not sure if this is feasible but maybe the article could be translated and moved to the Malayalam wiki since more sources would be available in that language. The ML editors would be able to verify offline sources when included. What do you think Soman? Vikram Vincent 07:13, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:20, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 19:12, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep because the subject is notable, but at least 1-2 sources must be added as citation to the article. Otherwise it should be deleted or trimmed, we cannot have completely unsourced articles. Bezrat (talk) 01:43, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.