Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BCODE (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:20, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

BCODE[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Re-nominating after previous closing admin expressed no concern with a rapid second nomination. Previous AfD closed as no consensus and had minimal participation.

This is an article about an apparently proprietary, branded SMS-based technology. The one included reference appears to be sourced from a third party press release, as appear to be most other coverage examples I can find online. It is important to note that bCODE is a (possibly defunct) company/product.

I believe this fails WP:N, WP:COMPANY, and comes close to running afoul of being an advertisement masquerading as an article. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 12:22, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:01, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 18:36, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 16:16, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.