Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azlea Antistia (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:09, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Azlea Antistia[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 16:43, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:GNG and WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 (talk) 12:44, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:08, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Agree. All nominations are scene nominations excluded from consideration under PORNBIO. Morbidthoughts (talk) 17:33, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails GNG without reliable source coverage. Fails PORNBIO with only scene award nominations. • Gene93k (talk) 20:48, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Routine matter implementing revision of applicable SNG, no evidence subject can satisfy GNG. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 17:34, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above; fails PORNBIO and no outside notability.BennyHillbilly (talk) 05:54, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this article was never notable - but now the policy and norms allow us to delete it BO | Talk 18:34, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not sure why this article is still being debated. --SimonKnowsAll (talk) 23:05, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.