Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avaidika
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. KTC (talk) 19:39, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Avaidika[edit]
- Avaidika (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:DICTDEF, but mainly part of a walled garden by this editor based on his own novel analysis of vedic terminology to apply it to modern science. DMacks (talk) 13:07, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:59, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:59, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:59, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete—I nearly tagged it when it came across NPP, but I thought it might develop into a real article. Hasn't happened yet, and unlikely to do so. WP:DICTDEF is correct. Livit⇑Eh?/What? 17:51, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I created this article and i have first hand contact with the speakers of a language which is about the most accurate in existence in terms Sanskrit variations, I clearly show with valid referencing what i am putting forward, I do not see a reason why this should be deleted.--Prestigiouzman (talk) 05:23, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:33, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable enough for an article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:19, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I've just taken another article by this editor to AfD - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tar Ua Mhesa and have found another dictionary type article Anulomana which I may also take to AfD. Dougweller (talk) 10:00, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.