Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Austrians in France

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 13:49, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Austrians in France[edit]

Austrians in France (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication the topic passes WP:GNG JbhTalk 11:14, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Editor is creating many such articles including.
Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. JbhTalk 11:39, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. JbhTalk 11:39, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. JbhTalk 11:39, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • It might have been better to do a combined AfD. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 12:21, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Qwertyus: I would not object to combining them but I do not know how to do that which is why I cross linked them. The Dutch people in France article was nominated by another editor so not sure how that would work. There are likely other articles by the same editor like these, I stopped after a dozen AfDs. JbhTalk 12:47, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Individual AfDs is a bit chaotic, but then it might be the case that some of these turn out to be notable while others are not, which could make a single AfD complicated too. It's a tricky call. Cordless Larry (talk) 13:33, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
For reference, instructions on creating an AfD for multiple articles are at WP:MULTIAFD. Cordless Larry (talk) 13:34, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:47, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - not supported by in-depth coverage in independent sources. Can't see where an article about this particular group in this particular country is notable. Onel5969 TT me 13:10, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.