Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audi Ur-S4 / Ur-S6

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 03:09, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Audi Ur-S4 / Ur-S6[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redundant to Audi S4 and Audi S6 and an implausible redirect. The article directs readers to the two aforementioned articles and provides only a brief explanation of what they are. The cars are covered in greater detail at those two articles, leaving little point to this page. Normally, redirecting would be the solution, but the article title doesn't lend itself to being redirected to one or the other specifically, so the most reasonable course of action would be to simply delete this page. Furthermore, the article itself states that the "Ur-" nomenclature is unofficial, suggesting that the title is a neologism of sorts anyway. Sable232 (talk) 02:46, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. Sable232 (talk) 02:46, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Sable232 (talk) 02:46, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete A10 as redundant to the existing articles on the cars. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:01, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per nom and Bushranger // Timothy :: talk 03:03, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - This article seems to have quite a few incoming links, but it is linked to on both Template:Audi and Template:Audi vehicles timeline (North America). It might be a good idea then to remove it from those to see if there are any other incoming links to decide if it's worth redirecting this somewhere, or changing those links. A7V2 (talk) 05:52, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - any incoming links that do not originate with the templates should be redirected to the appropriate articles when suitable. Best, Mr.choppers | ✎ 04:08, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator comment: I have removed the link to this page from the two templates mentioned above, and that has eliminated nearly all of the incoming links in article space. The remainder are either under a "See also" section or could be easily retargeted or removed.
The article has existed since 2005; is it really eligible for speedy deletion under A10? I didn't expect that it would be, not having been recently created. --Sable232 (talk) 02:17, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.