Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atlantic Beach, Rhode Island

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Misquamicut, Rhode Island. Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:19, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Atlantic Beach, Rhode Island[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It exists, but dosen't seem to meet WP:GEOLAND or WP:GNG. I can't see a reasonable WP:ATD. Boleyn (talk) 08:26, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:54, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rhode Island-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:54, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Amusement parks-related deletion discussions. Toughpigs (talk) 01:53, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

comment The website for the place calls it "Atlantic Beach Park" (my emphasis). This is not an article about a settlement and needs to be renamed if kept. Personally I'm not terribly convinced of its notability but amusement parks are not my bailiwick. Mangoe (talk) 14:04, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Having looked into this a little further, I'm going to suggest Merge to Misquamicut, Rhode Island. I've found plenty enough references to it, but what they say about it can be put in a not-terribly-ong paragraph. Mangoe (talk) 01:15, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to easy AtD: Misquamicut, Rhode Island, of which it is part and whose article would be improved with info, with addition of "Park" to subsection Djflem (talk) 18:24, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Merge according to Djflem's preferences. Because they've improved the article so much since the AfD tag went on. If kept, and if anybody wants to, ping me and I'll add this carousel to the list at Allan Herschell Company. --Lockley (talk) 22:37, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Lockley: Would go ahead and do that in any case.Djflem (talk) 05:58, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but better to wait for AfD discussion to close first. --Lockley (talk) 09:08, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep thanks to Djflem. I wouldn't be opposed to a merge as per Lockley. — Toughpigs (talk) 02:03, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge: per Djflem. Looking over the sources that have been added, I don't see anything more than casual mentions -- a paragraph here, a paragraph there. Merging's entirely appropriate, though. Ravenswing 06:54, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.