Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arvind Yadav

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 14:26, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Arvind Yadav[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person. Has been tendentiously moved into mainspace by the WP:SPA author (whom I blocked for failing to respond to a paid editing query), who also contested a PROD. MER-C 11:46, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:12, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:12, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:12, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:12, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:13, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NBIO and WP:GNG. –Cupper52^Discuss! 13:00, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 14:28, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — Per rationale provided by MER-C, subject was of the article lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable. Celestina007 (talk) 17:19, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - none of his roles would give him a presumption of notability under WP:NSPORTS and I'm not seeing enough for GNG Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:06, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per MER-C fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:11, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:GNG, probably WP:UPE. Ravensfire (talk) 14:25, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Vanity article. RationalPuff (talk) 20:26, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, WP:GNG, and WP:MILL. No insult, but a physiotherapist to an Olympic team is not notable. Bearian (talk) 16:04, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.