Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artists for Peace and Justice

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 22:31, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Artists for Peace and Justice[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I would have considered a G11 on this promotional article, had it not been accepted from AfC. Sentences in an article about an organization in the form X began when Y met Z.... are almost always the work of paid promotional editors or those who imitate them DGG ( talk ) 21:08, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:27, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:27, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:27, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep notability demonstrated in HuffPo and Canada.com references. In the absense of promotional tone, we need to remember to assume good faith here. RadioFan (talk) 01:57, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TBrandley (T • C • B) 15:46, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Paul Haggis. Candleabracadabra (talk) 04:18, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:43, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep—references indicate notability, and merging to the organization's creator doesn't make sense, as it will (hopefully) continue after he's gone. Livit⇑^Eh?/_What? 15:24, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.