Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arham Abbasi (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. per consensus among policy-based !Votes. Going to salt given shenanigans around creation. If it passes AfC at some point in the future with an established reviewer, unsalting is fine Star Mississippi 02:23, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Arham Abbasi[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Created first by Iansumanbhagat; who then used a separate account Krishnarthiindia to resubmit it as an AfC draft. Meanwhile it was declined three times by Dan arndt, Theroadislong and me as well. Thereafter, a new editor Trakinwiki takes this forward and asks several editors to review it. I declined it again but a new AfC volunteer Batamore approved it thinking that it meets WP:NACTOR. Ravensfire had earlier AfDed it and it was deleted. That said, I concur with what Ravensfire thought earlier and what they think now. I'm inviting a fresh discussion on this as I do not feel this meets WP:NACTOR at any case because there is just one significant lead role and NACTOR needs several! ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 04:24, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep References are somewhat niche, but there are a good amount. The actor seems to have at least one significant role. WP:NACTOR asks for multiple significant roles so this may not meet that exactly but I believe that the actor is significant enough to meet WP:GNG. GoldMiner24 (talk) 06:20, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:06, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:06, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:07, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Nothing changed from the last AfD, except dumping of poor references. No evidence of meeting NACTOR which needs multiple significant roles in notable productions backed up reliable sources. Cannot see any GNG-worthy coverage either as passing mentions, interviews, and WP:NOTRS sources do not establish notability. -- Ab207 (talk) 08:06, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep . I feel the subject is notable because the subject has done a lead role in Prayag and an important character in the tv show Imlie as i thoroughly read those coverages. Batamore (talk) 15:50, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
being a lead role in just one movie/film doesn't satisfy WP:NACTOR. I do not see any indication of his work in the Imlie that could help pass WP:NACTOR. GNG isn't met anyway. ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 17:11, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per nom. Neither the subject is passing WP:NACTOR nor WP:GNG independently. ManaliJain (talk) 12:08, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:14, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Explicit source analysis and additional input from the community may be required to achieve a consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mhawk10 (talk) 06:41, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes GNG. Knight Skywalker (talk) 09:26, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
May I know how? ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 13:28, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: as per nom. Fails WP:GNG, and WP:NACTOR. - Hatchens (talk) 04:44, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.