Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ara Paiaya

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Daniel (talk) 11:41, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ara Paiaya[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

all sources insanely trivial mentions. all others found were similarly trivial. ltbdl (talk) 11:37, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ltbdl (talk) 11:37, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As required by the guideline, he has played an important role (mostly, directing) in the creation of at least one notable film having received coverage. His role as director is noted (in general negatively) for various films (examples: [1], [2], etc.) if that was necessary. (those mentions are generally not extensive but that is not necessary in this case)-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 14:32, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@mushy yank: what guideline? ltbdl (talk) 02:03, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
WP:DIRECTOR -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 07:07, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:45, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I just watched one of his films (Night Driver) on Amazon Prime (UK). Isn't availability of his material on that platform enough to make him notable? REVOL 17:01, 7 October 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by REVOL (talk • contribs)

No. Notability is determined by multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject giving signicant coverage. -- Mike 🗩 19:54, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: BLP, fails GNG and NBIO. Source eval:

Comments	Source
Promo about a movie, Subject name listed, no SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.	1. "Mickey Rourke joins Traffik". Screen Daily.
Promo about a movie, Subject name listed, no SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.	2. ^ "Mickey Rourke, Daryl Hannah, Eric Roberts to Star in 'Skin Traffik' (EXCLUSIVE)". Variety. 13 August 2013.
Sony, fails WP:IS	3. ^ "Skin Traffik: Sony Pictures Home Entertainment". Sony Pictures.
Sony, fails WP:IS	4. ^ "Instant Death: Sony Pictures Home Entertainment". Sony Pictures.
About a movie, Subject name listed, no SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth.	5. ^ "First look: Tough guys take over 'Skin Traffik' poster". USA Today.

A name being listed does not meet WP:SIGCOV. BEFORE showed nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS, with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and INDEPTH. // Timothy :: talk 08:10, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:46, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - B-movie professional but has enough cover to support in my opinion. https://www.proquest.com/docview/334022315/D4AF1923232B48FCPQ/17, https://www.proquest.com/docview/1693478955/D4AF1923232B48FCPQ/20, https://www.proquest.com/docview/334090449/D4AF1923232B48FCPQ/8, https://www.proquest.com/docview/328440351/D4AF1923232B48FCPQ/5, https://www.proquest.com/docview/339476412/D4AF1923232B48FCPQ/4, https://www.proquest.com/docview/2765662491/Record/D4AF1923232B48FCPQ/2, https://www.proquest.com/docview/2785550373/D4AF1923232B48FCPQ/1 - Indefensible (talk) 04:17, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 00:58, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:59, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.