Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aqua Connect (3rd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 22:06, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aqua Connect[edit]

Aqua Connect (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

DELETE Blatant advertising of a non-notable piece of software. The article has now been deleted at least seven times. Article keeps being resurrected by Single Issue Editors or accounts with suspiciously low activity. AlistairMcMillan (talk) 18:07, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • A little summary

September 21, 2008

September 22, 2008

September 23, 2008

  • 04:46 Aqua Connect re-created by User:JoMoMac (first of three total edits)
  • 05:51 Aqua Connect deleted by User:Kimchi.sg
  • 05:52 User:JoMoMac blocked indefinitely for re-creating a spam page
  • 07:13 Aqua Connect protected to prevent re-creation by User:Kimchi.sg until October 23

September 24, 2008

  • 16:25 Aqua "c"onnect article re-created by User:CMLeister (no other edits, and please note lower case C again)
  • 16:27 Aqua "c"onnect deleted by User:NawlinWiki

September 26, 2009

  • 16:39 Deletion review started by User:66.134.162.202 (obviously MacJarvis as he/she clearly states they wrote the deleted article)

October 2, 2008

December 6, 2009

  • 20:33 Aqua Connect deleted by User:Wizardman after second discussion results in delete decision.

November 2, 2011‎

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 19:34, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for now likely as my first searches News, Books and browser found nothing particularly good. Pinging the still most active Stifle and ContinueWithCaution and sending a hatnote to MuZeMike. SwisterTwister talk 06:38, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and salt all versions of the name including AquaConnect, Aqua Connect, and Aqua connect. The company is not notable; it appears the only coverage it has received relates to a lawsuit against another company. I just deleted a paragraph which had nothing to do with Aqua Connect. That leaves four references: the company's own website (primary source), a court filing (primary source), an article about the lawsuit in Lexology, and a dead link to barbieslapp.com. Clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. --MelanieN (talk) 22:05, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.