Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Appian Technology

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Closing as a keep, although a merge discussion may prove fruitful.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:56, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Appian Technology[edit]

Appian Technology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company. I could not find any significant coverage, and the company may be out of business. Bloomberg Businessweek lists it but shows no recent activity; the phone number they list has been disconnected, and I couldn't find a website for the company. MelanieN (talk) 22:25, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep I could find the company in two separate Indian newspapers (the Times of India and the Economic Times) and plenty of other sources. Why delete it? ChromaNebula (talk) 23:01, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Do you know what those Indian references said? I did notice that Google suggested there was a company profile at The Times of India, but the link was dead. In any case, "company profiles" are usually just reprints of company-supplied information--MelanieN (talk) 20:35, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. MelanieN (talk) 23:47, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. MelanieN (talk) 23:52, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep ZyMOS (talk) 09:29, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment On further searching, I found that the company (originally named ZyMOS) went bankrupt in 1994 and that most of its assets were acquired by Cirrus Logic.[1] So a merge/redirect to Cirrus Logic is a possibility. --MelanieN (talk) 20:35, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.