Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Appear

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 18:53, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Appear[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per source searches, this company does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH or WP:GNG. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:37, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:38, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:38, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:39, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:39, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- thinly veiled advertising brochure. Reyk _YO! 08:21, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —MRD2014 ^{Talk • Edits • Help!} 01:14, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As a company, it fails WP:COMPANY. GeoffreyT2000 ^{(talk, contribs)} 01:43, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG. References fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 15:33, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.