Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Chiappe

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kpgjhpjm 16:53, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Chiappe[edit]

Anna Chiappe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There's no claim of notability other than her marriage to José Carlos Mariátegui. The only hit on a Bing search is a picture on Flickr - posted in the context of her husband. The source provided is about her husband with a passing mention of Chiappe (as Anita) in a footnote. Redirect to José Carlos Mariátegui. Cabayi (talk) 09:28, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 09:30, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 09:30, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:36, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:21, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:21, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • If not kept (about which I have no view), Merge to José Carlos Mariátegui rather than delete. Her notability seems to be derived from that of her husband, in keeping his archives and campaigning to preserve his memory. This could be dealt with in a new section of his article dealing with family and posterity. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:06, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Passes WP:GNG per articles in multiple publications. There are multiple blog hits on a DuckDuckGo search, and they reference multiple lengthy third-party sources. wumbolo ^^^ 10:36, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:16, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Wumbolo. Passes GNG. Regards, Knightrises10 talk 11:31, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep.Found reliable sources and qualifies the notability WP:ANYBIO and she has received the award.Vinodbasker (talk) 16:26, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I can understand why this was nommed (due to article state), however she is covered by multiple RSes per my BEFORE - numerous books as well as current news reporting. Icewhiz (talk) 08:08, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.