Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anirudh Baboo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 02:14, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anirudh Baboo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was unsure to do a A7 or a XFD-went with this in the end. Seems to be a very unotable director with no info Wgolf (talk) 20:06, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Yeah, I was just about to put a PROD it. The subject is a student making a YouTube movie. That is not notable enough for an article even though the local newspaper gave it a quick write-up. --DanielRigal (talk) 20:13, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Yeah the newspaper part is nice, but almost seems like "local guy has 15 minutes of fame!"-On another note, I found this Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anirudh Baboo as well as a link to the page that went to another user (possible sockpuppets?) Wgolf (talk) 20:17, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:CREATIVE. Abandoned draft deleted as G13. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 01:08, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:54, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:54, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable and no reliable sources available. Shanata (talk) 03:11, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete : Not at all notable. Proposing for Speedy delete.Athachil (talk) 13:11, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -It fails FILMMAKER and GNG. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 21:43, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bahrain-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:53, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.