Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela's Christmas Wish

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sandstein 08:10, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Angela's Christmas Wish[edit]

Angela's Christmas Wish (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previous PROD removed when one review was added, but no others can be found. Seems to fail WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 20:42, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 20:42, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 20:52, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep supplied references appears to meet WP:NFO "The film is widely distributed and has received full-length reviews by two or more nationally known critics." Jeepday (talk) 14:47, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please elaborate on the second review, as only one (Common Sense Media) is cited in the article and I couldn't find any others. Donaldd23 (talk) 15:56, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I Clicked the google link find sources and it brought back, 243,000 results not sure what criteria to apply for "nationally known critics" but I think this one easily makes it. Jeepday (talk) 19:11, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 01:18, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as Rotten Tomatoes here has links to 4 critics reviews, not sure about 2 of them but Common Sense Media and Decider are reliable sources. (Decider is owned by The New York Post). WP:GNG is passed so deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:58, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: The Common Sense Media review is good, and the Animation Scoop interview looks legit to me. — Toughpigs (talk) 01:42, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.