Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrzej Majewski
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:57, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Andrzej Majewski[edit]
- Andrzej Majewski (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced BLP for which I can find no reliable sources or significant independent coverage. Majewski sounds notable, but I can find nothing to verify the claims made in the article. I also checked the three interwiki articles and they are unsourced as well. If the article content is not verifiable, then notability cannot be established. Jezebel'sPonyoshhh 20:18, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:59, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:59, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. —Hoary (talk) 02:56, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Searching is hampered by this being a common name in Polish, but any sources for his books of aphorisms should be picked up by Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL. Google News, which indexes many Polish newspapers, finds nothing, and the general web search only seems to find sites where you can buy the books. Worldcat lists a grand total of seven library holdings for the three books of aphorisms.[1][2][3][4] Phil Bridger (talk) 17:00, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:41, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Qwerp ♫ ♪ ツ 00:31, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unsourced BLP, please consider a prod next time. —fetch·comms 00:52, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.