Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anapsytics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:15, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anapsytics[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable neologism. Fails WP:GNG. - Mr X 14:29, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A Google search for this term on the web shows only this Wikipedia article as a result. A search in Google books and Google Scholar shows no hits. The entire article reads like an ad for some HR company's new improved screening process. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:41, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:48, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:48, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:48, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as my searches found nothing good at all. SwisterTwister talk 06:53, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.