Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anabella Queen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. I could relist this again but instead I'm closing it now at No consensus. A greater level of thoughtful participation would have helped bring this discussion to a more decisive closure. Liz Read! Talk! 07:42, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anabella Queen[edit]

Anabella Queen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promo BLP, fails GNG and NBIO. Sources in the article and found in BEFORE do not meet WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. May be a case of TOOSOON, but this is pretty clearly a promo article.  // Timothy :: talk  07:07, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 07:02, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: Weak keep, I don't think TOOSOON applies, it's been five yrs. Regardless, this is typical coverage [2]. Oaktree b (talk) 16:13, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I'd like to hear more about sources found on other versions of this article that could be incorporated in our version.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:04, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want more references on the page, why don't you add them? tell me !!! Soy Pau ♥️♥️ (talk) 15:42, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Soy Pau ♥️♥️, my role here is to assess AFD discussions, not improve articles. If you have questions about sources, I recommend bringing them to the Teahouse. Liz Read! Talk! 22:19, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Then do you want sources in the articule? OK me too. Then in this days, I am going to add sources for the Page dont be delate.Bye Lynitaa 2.0 (talk) 06:54, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.