Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ameri-Indian Alaskan Husky

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Barkeep49 (talk) 21:53, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ameri-Indian Alaskan Husky[edit]

Ameri-Indian Alaskan Husky (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. Can find nothing at all about these dogs, the webpage sited in the article [1] is not only short of WP:RS as a self-published webpage from an enthusiast, but it makes no mention of these dogs. A google search revealed nothing attributable, only a Wikipedia mirror page and a cushion cover available from Amazon. Searches of Google books and Google scholar found nothing. Cavalryman (talk) 00:04, 29 July 2020 (UTC).[reply]

https://www.canadashistory.ca/explore/first-nations,-inuit-metis/the-hair-of-the-dog — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.249.229.10 (talk) 00:21, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 104.249.229.10 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), the link you have provided above makes no mention of these dogs either. Kind regards, Cavalryman (talk) 00:28, 29 July 2020 (UTC).[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 07:33, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The article is based on one un-WP:RELIABLE source with no author given nor references provided. It claims that this dog is a "type" of Alaskan Husky, which is a mix of dogs itself. There is no evidence of "Amer-Indians" owning this husky. William Harristalk 07:37, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete In addition to being virtually unreferenced (one citation to a non-RS source... which calls the breed by a different name altogether!) and hence failing WP:GNG / WP:V, at least one passage has been copied verbatim from the cited source, with other content that looks like rewordings. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:38, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete. per nom. Apple731a (talk) 08:43, 1 August 2020 (UTC) Struck !vote from blocked disruption-only account editing here to WP:GAME autoconfirmed. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 06:52, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.