Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alok Chaturvedi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 13:21, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alok Chaturvedi[edit]
- Alok Chaturvedi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- Delete. Non-notable businessman, fails WP:BIO, references provide only passing reference to the subject. WWGB (talk) 11:52, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- Eastmain (talk) 17:27, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- Eastmain (talk) 17:27, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. The article should be restored if he wins a seat in the upcoming election. -- Eastmain (talk) 17:27, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:18, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No indication that he help a significant political office, and he's managing a non-notable company. Being the brother of another politician does not make him notable either. VG ☎ 22:48, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep As article says he is prospected candidate for forthcoming MP elecction. What is the loss if we wait till election which is 1 month later. Aminami (talk) 12:31, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- because "being an unelected candidate for political office does not guarantee notability". IF he is elected then it will not be difficult to re-create such a short article. He is not notable now, so does not warrant an article now. WWGB (talk) 04:05, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Highly non-notable. If he wins in the election and becomes and MP, then he becomes notable, not until then. --GDibyendu (talk) 05:51, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.