Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allison Munn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. 331dot (talk) 14:14, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Allison Munn[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: as insufficiently notable television actress. Quis separabit? 20:21, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – main role in three separate TV series (over decades), and a fourth significant role on One Tree Hill. That's pretty much the definition of meeting WP:NACTOR. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:24, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:31, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:31, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:31, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep While the article certainly could use some references and pruning, quick search finds confirmation of significant roles in multiple notable TV shows, thereby meeting WP:NACTOR#1. Bakazaka (talk) 20:36, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Believe passes WP:NACTOR — as detailed above — but sourcing needs improvement. Eagleash (talk) 20:51, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete People magazine alone is not enough to build an article on. We need better sourcing.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:27, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Well-exposed and well-reported enough that a reader might reasonably expect to find an article on this subject here. bd2412 T 14:43, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Keep Ok she's not Julia Roberts, but she's famous enough. Two main cast credits on shows of significance, and a slew of other credits, as well as time in theatre. WP:NACTOR #1 is met. I haven't gone through every news story here, but there appears to be continuing coverage of her. --Hammersoft (talk) 16:16, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep She passes WP:NACTOR but needs additional sourcing. She is popular and has worked on major television shows BetaN2 (talk) 05:09, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep on the basis of NACTOR (a leading role in two or more major television projects or motion pictures). Chetsford (talk) 22:25, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep seems fairly well-known and appears to pass WP:NACTOR--Seacactus 13 (talk) 15:17, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
KeepThe article definitely needs more sources but it passes WP:NACTOR . Kpg jhp jm 01:53, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:NACTOR.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:06, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.