Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Power

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of Marvel Comics characters: P. And/or to Power Pack, as editors may decide. Sandstein 20:57, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Power[edit]

Alex Power (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite a lot of discussion, the article contains no references to independent sources and no assertion of notability. There has been some edit-warring about whether to redirect it to the Power Pack article, so I'm listing it to achieve consensus. Slashme (talk) 14:26, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 15:22, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 15:22, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge. I'm going to copy over my comment from the merge discussion that had been occurring (and which I hope any closer will take into account when closing this AfD): no indication that Alex Power is independently notable; neutral on the target. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 14:30, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - a merge discussion is in process at Talk:Power Pack#Merge discussion with Alex Power. Argento Surfer (talk) 14:52, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to List of Marvel Comics characters: P - character is notable within the fiction and meets my criteria for an entry. Too much character development has happened outside the pages of Power Pack for that article to be a suitable target. Argento Surfer (talk) 14:53, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm fine with merging--as long as the content is kept in check a bit. As with all these articles, there is just too much unverified OR/plot summary/fictional biography/etc., what some have called "cruft". Drmies (talk) 15:52, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge - very selectively. No real world notability. Onel5969 TT me 15:57, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge Per Drmies. -- ferret (talk) 17:17, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Re-voted below after source analysis, still in support of merge -- ferret (talk) 13:07, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep if sources can be found, otherwise merge - not sure why an AFD is necessary or appropriate when an ongoing merge discussion had just been started. BOZ (talk) 20:34, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    With all due respect BOZ, if you vote keep "if sources can be found", there's an onus on you to provide those sources. -- ferret (talk) 20:59, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: I see sources when I type in “Alex Power comics” so I might see if I can improve on that when I am not busy. Jhenderson 777 21:25, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge No enough of significance to be remain well published. Sheldybett (talk) 12:39, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: I am agreeing with @Jhenderson777: on his claim. --Rtkat3 (talk) 03:19, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Jhenderson 777 15:33, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I think it’s premature to put this character as deleted or redirected. He is reprising his role as a a leader of the Future Foundation in comics and a Power Pack movie is in talks which is getting coverage. Jhenderson 777 15:39, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Seems like an analysis of the sources provided today would be proper
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:14, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You contradict yourself at the end. You say the articles are about Power Pack but you say the sources say he was the leader of Future Foundation. Also I should note he was a New Warriors member too. So redirecting to Power Pack is uncalled for. Also you are contesting the sources for brief info. WP:GNG is not always about the info but what sources can be found for the character. Coverage is still coverage. He’s obviously no Spider-Man and it’s uncalled for to put him on that pedestal. Jhenderson 777 13:39, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
We'll have to agree to disagree. There's zero indepth anything here. It's literally single mentions, and most of then not even whole sentences dedicated to him. -- ferret (talk) 13:43, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: What about the rest of Power family? Since editors seem determined to pick on this one article. Jhenderson 777 13:25, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One AFD at a time. Let's not throw an WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument in. -- ferret (talk) 13:43, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I am well aware of that essay. I tried my best just to ask a question and not violate it. Jhenderson 777 14:11, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I think merging them into Power Pack would be pretty uncontroversial, considering how this AfD is going. As far as I know, they don't have much significance outside of the team. I still think Alex should be listed on the Marvel characters list due to his development in New Warriors and FF. Argento Surfer (talk) 13:04, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge there are some sources, but not sure enough for independent notability. Ypatch (talk) 22:08, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Selectively merge, preferably to Power Pack. There's already a section there detailing his activities outside the team. Alternatively merge to the characters list. Namenamenamenamename (talk) 02:11, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to List of Marvel Comics characters: P per Argento Surfer. - GretLomborg (talk) 04:57, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to Power Pack, per Ferret's analysis of the found sources. I also think it should be fairly uncontroversial to merge the other Power Pack members to the same article without needing separate discussions for each one, based on how the consensus here is going. Rorshacma (talk) 16:04, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.