Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alameda's hot springs retreat

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Hot Springs, Montana. Star Mississippi 23:03, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alameda's hot springs retreat[edit]

Alameda's hot springs retreat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has not received significant coverage in multiple sources. 777burger user talk contribs 22:09, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - Here are a few sources:
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 00:14, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep. I'll add this newspaper article from The Missoulian to the list of sources: [1][2]. Still, I think this might be better covered in Hot Springs, Montana per WP:NOTGUIDEBOOK. Jfire (talk) 03:17, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to Hot Springs, Montana - Think it was known as Camas Hot Springs for a long time. Shining the Hot Springs Bat Signal in the sky for netherzone - I'm going to see what I can do to improve/expand. Any help appreciated. jengod (talk) 05:11, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Thanks for the ping, jengod. I'll see what I can find. It may be notable as an establishment, they've been around for 85 years. But I'm also thinking the hot springs as a geological feature probably could meet WP:NATFEAT if that part of the article can be improved through sourcing. Netherzone (talk) 05:46, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment Yeah from what I'm getting so far the hot springs and the tribal control thereof and the rise and fall of a couple of associated bathhouses/hotels are all encyclopedic for sure, but I suspect that Alameda's per se is a comparatively small part of the story. I expect a name change/move will be called for but still readin'... jengod (talk) 07:16, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment Changed my vote from keep to merge. Also created Camas Hot Springs. Also note Symes Hotel. I think this particular assemblage of cabins and infrastructure has some minor notability so if it's kept that's fine but a merge probably the best decision on its current state of referencedness, etc. jengod (talk) 09:20, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge - agree with other editors above that merging is the best alternative to deletion. Either potential target Hot Springs, Montana or the new article Camas Hot Springs is fine with me. Netherzone (talk) 17:25, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge with Hot Springs, Montana: per above eval.  // Timothy :: talk  17:03, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.