Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Baraka Bank Egypt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:35, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Al Baraka Bank Egypt[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of importance or notability, article is not written in neutral point of view. 64andtim (chat) 07:13, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete: This article isn't notable, and the neutrality of this article is disputed. CastJared (talk) 08:23, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Business, and Egypt. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:41, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This article briefly mentions the milestones that al Barak Bank Egypt has achieved throughout its time.

This is a bank that has been operating for 40 years in Egypt, it's important to list it, and its credentials on versatile page as Wikipedia. Maha G Aboud (talk) 08:34, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is a bit of coverage in these books: [1], [2], [3]. There may be more, but I gave up looking because the article is so promotional that it would need a complete rewrite anyway. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:26, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I'd like to hear from more editors about whether anything here is salvageable. Definitely a promotionally written article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:07, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Egregious WP:PROMO and fails WP:GNG --TheInsatiableOne (talk) 07:17, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect To Al Baraka Banking Group, which itself could use more and better sourcing, as an ATD. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 08:42, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect - Not in the article's current state. Half the references are to the company itself. - Imcdc Contact 12:28, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: very very promotional

FuzzyMagma (talk) 11:08, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.